The South has Risen !
“Save
your Confederate money. The South will rise again.” Everybody laughed. No one is laughing now.
The Confederate denominations are worth more than U S
currency. At a Signature House auction
a few years ago, a Confederate T-1 $1,000 note was sold for $15,000 – and it
was a bargain at that.
Everything Southern and Confederate (there is a difference)
are highly sought after. Flags, uniforms, guns, swords, even uniform buttons
and belt buckles, will bring premium dollars in the collectibles market. A few auctions back there was an old
moth-eaten frock coat and trousers which had belonged to a Mississippi colonel
which brought $23,000.
In the autograph marketplace, the Confederates consistently
bring premium prices. Of course, R. E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and J.E.B. Stuart
are sought after. Even the obscure generals are prized. There are many collectors whose goal is to
obtain all of the Confederate generals; while others seek the Northern generals.
A noble endeavor for sure – the question is “Why?”
The answer is that the passion for the cause that started
long before the war is still with us today.
When the thirteen
original states joined together to fight for their independence from England, they
signed a declaration of their independence in which certain passages had been
stricken on which they could not agree. Hard fought compromises had been made.
The issue of slavery was chief among these compromises. Then came the Constitution and the issue of
a stronger federal government vs. individual states rights. Washington and Jefferson saw the future
resting on strong state governments; while James Madison, the architect of the
Constitution, saw how lose the federation of states really was. As President during the War of 1812, he was
worried that all of New England was going to leave this new federation of
states because of the trade that existed between the coastal Northern states
and England. Madison was in fear of New England exercising their Constitutional
rights and leaving the Union.
There also was an economical division between the Northern
states and the Southern states in their development as an industrial society
vs. the slavery-driven traditional dependence on agriculture, especially “king
cotton.” In a competitive marketplace,
tariffs were passed affecting Southern-grown products. Too, England and France were better markets
for cotton.
As the country expanded and more states were added to the
Union, the North pushed to abolish slavery. The South clung to the institution
as its birthright and came to believe that the only way its culture was to
survive lay in leaving the Union.
Andrew Jackson, a Southerner by birth, would not allow the South to
leave and, in fact, threatened to mobilize troops. Then came the years of compromise. Great leaders from both sides argued their cause. Jackson’s Vice President, John C. Calhoun,
resigned to lead the South in its quest for independence. The North had the brilliant orator Daniel
Webster who argued against the institution of slavery; and Henry Clay, “the
great compromiser,” sought the middle ground.
These great statesmen kept the country together, but nothing was really
resolved. The North became more
entrenched as fanatical abolitionists became more influential. The recalcitrant Southern planters
steadfastly resisted any threat to their economy. While most historians agree that slavery would have become uneconomical
in time, the industrial revolution relentlessly pushed its way South and fanaticism
on both sides increased tremendously.
Neither the Whigs nor the Democrats would directly take on
the uneasy question of slavery. Then in
1856, the Republican Party was founded principally to end slavery. Its first candidate was Western explorer
John Charles Fremont, the “Pathfinder.”
He did well but the country settled for a compromise candidate, James
Buchanan. He attempted to keep the country together, but the pot was boiling. In the North, William Lloyd Garrison,
Wendell Phillips and the former slave Frederick Douglass called for
emancipation. In the South, extremist
Edmund Ruffin editorialized for a second war of independence, together with
Howell Cobb and Robert Tombs, legislators who openly called for the dissolution
of the Union.
Then came the election of 1860. Vice President John Breckenridge of Kentucky was acceptable to
the South as a compromise candidate.
Stephen Douglas wanted each state to make its own decision regarding
slavery, even new states entering the Union such as Kansas and Nebraska. He satisfied neither abolitionists nor
slaveholders. From the West came a
little known politician put forth by the new Republican Party, the prairie
lawyer Abraham Lincoln who had previously achieved recognition in his debates
with Douglas. “A house divided cannot
stand, “ Lincoln said. “It shall be all one thing or all the other.” The Union
could not continue to exist half slave and half free. And everyone knew he opposed slavery.
The South feared Lincoln.
His election would ignite the powder keg of unresolved frustration.
However, he did not get a majority of votes. The South was divided between
Breckenridge and Douglass. Lincoln became President much to everyone’s surprise
for many had supposed Breckenridge would win.
Thus fearing of the new President, the South began to mobilize its state
militias. South Carolina and several
other states declared their intention of leaving the Union. The taking of Federal garrisons would seem
to be standard in the wake of such a declaration. If in fact you were leaving the Union, you would not want its
forts to remain occupied by Federals.
The fortifications would certainly no longer be garrisoned for Southern
protection. I have read the
hand-written declaration of war from Governor Pinckney of South Carolina
presented to the Confederate Congress in Mobile. Participants believed they had done everything possible to comply
with the North. They had pleaded,
negotiated and even threatened – all to no avail. They interpreted the Federal
reinforcement of Ft. Sumter as a hostile act and their only recourse was to
fire upon it and drive the Federals out from a state owned fort. This action lit the fuse that ignited the
conflagration pitting state against state.
At the time, there were only seven minor states exercising
their right to leave the Union. Where
were they going? What would they do as
the industrial revolution overtook them?
Many believe they would have eventually rejoined the Union and that
Lincoln should have held back Northern mobilization.
On the other hand, the capital city would be surrounded if
Maryland, a border state, seceded as well. The President called for 75,000
troops. This act brought the rest of
the South into the confederation including North Carolina and the key state of
Virginia. Now there were eleven states
in the new Confederacy. All the years
of fiery passions on both sides unresolved since the Revolutionary War erupted
into the War Between the States.
The firing upon Ft. Sumter incensed Northern firebrands.
Southern sympathizer, former Secretary of War John Floyd was called a traitor
when he shipped large numbers of weapons to Southern forts now in Rebel
hands. Garrison and Wendell Phillips
scolded Lincoln for not freeing all the slaves. Frederick Douglass was exhorting the slaves to take up arms
against their masters as had John Brown before him in 1859.
The South was busy forming a new government. Jefferson Davis
of Mississippi was elected President and Alexander Stephens of Georgia became
the Vice President. To me, the toughest
job given to any man was to Stephan Mallory of Florida, appointed the first
secretary of the navy. He had no men,
no ships and no money to buy them. But
the new Confederacy announced it would fight if attacked -- and fight it did.
Both sides underestimated each other. The large, populous North had many more men,
more factories, more guns, more ships – more, more and more. President Lincoln asked only for a 90-day
enlistment.
The South with its resolve and chivalrous belief that right
makes might had no doubt it would prevail.
To the rugged, outdoor farming men of the South, guns, horses and the
elements posed no obstacles. And each
side believed God was with them. Abolitionist
preachers in the North exhorted against the evils of slavery. Immigrants from Ireland, Germany and the
rest of Europe thought their new country was the Promised Land and freedom
worth the fight. As for the blacks,
both free and slave, Lincoln initially hesitated to use these men as troops,
but as the Union ranks were reduced by the long war, black regiments were
formed and many bravely fought and died for their freedom.
The Old South was fighting for its way of life and wanted to
be left alone. But their homeland was
being invaded. Even Southerners who did
not believe in slavery, when asked what they were fighting for said, “Because
you are down here.” The invasion by the
North would surely loose God’s wrath.
Their national anthem was not “Dixie” but “God Save the South.” Episcopalian Bishop Leonides Polk, a West
Point graduate, became a Confederate lieutenant general and along with devout
Christians R. E. Lee and T. J. Jackson intended to lead this new Christian
nation. Their battle cry, “Down with
the eagle; up with the cross” resounded throughout the Confederacy.
The North with more resources and the firm resolve of
President Lincoln won the bitterly fought war.
The South, under its great leaders R. E. Lee, “Stonewall” Jackson, and
J.E.B. Stuart, gave a good account of itself and was cheered on by much of
Europe. Gallant in war and gracious in
surrender, what would have happened if the CSA had won the war? How would Lincoln have been treated? It is well to remember that it is the victorious
who write the history texts. Never have
the conquered been treated so gallantly or so romanticized by scholars. This no doubt has contributed to the
popularity of Confederate collectibles.
Why collect autographs, mementos and relics of the War Between
the States? First, let us say that it
was not a Civil War, i.e. two factions fighting for one government. Indeed, the US Congress determined it was to
be called the War Between the States, as Southern historian Jim Hayes,
rightfully insists.
The passion of the war and its remembrance remain to this
day. Signature House participates in
most of the large Civil War shows, and regionalism abounds. In Gettysburg people ask for Pennsylvania
Bucktails. In Mansfield they ask for collectibles from Ohio regiments. In Nashville, you might hear such comments
as, “My grandfather rode with Nathan Bedford Forrest…” In Charleston we are
asked for the South Carolina Palmettos. In Richmond we heard the story of a
young man whose great grandfather saw Robert E. Lee ride by him on his famous
horse Traveler.
We have seen people collect everything pertaining to the
war; naturally autographs, documents and letters, but also CDVs - signed or
unsigned - can bring high dollars. A
signed CDV of R. E. Lee, quite common, can bring $4,000 - $5,000 depending on
condition, the presence of a backstamp and when it was signed.
From the modestly priced tax document to the highly prized
Charleston slave tag, slave relics are highly sought after by collectors. A
document passed through our hands from Richmond regarding the sale of a slave
March 30, 1865 in that city. Less than
a week later on April 4, the Confederate capital fell and Lincoln walked
through its streets. Most probably this was the last slave sold -- which
conjures all kinds of curious questions. Did the buyer get a bargain price or
have to pay premium? What kind of money
was used in the transaction since Confederate money was all but worthless? What was the agent’s sales pitch: Get the
last one before the Yankees get here?
For me, the strongest and most ironic document was an 1859
petition to the Charleston legislature by a free black man requesting to
relinquish his freedom and become a slave.
His reasoning was that his father and brother were slaves and were living
better than he. It was hard for him to
find work; and every time something was amiss in his community, he would be
blamed. He had no protection. The only way the slave-owning family would
take him was for him to give up his freedom.
He must have been granted his petition.
After 1860, this man was not listed on the rolls of South Carolina free
men.
The ironies of the war are numerous. John Mosby’s raiders
plundered the Union Army in the Shenandoah Valley. Yet after the war he worked
for the Department of Justice. John
Gilmore, who rode with J.E.B. Stuart, made raids around Baltimore, robbing
banks, stealing cattle and with a reputation as being a real rogue with the
ladies. A bank check passed through our
hands made payable to him as Baltimore Police Commissioner. And there are those who think nothing has
changed. The rogues are still in power
and politics.
One of the more heated controversies springs from the origin
of the sobriquet “Stonewall” connected with T. J. Jackson. Did Bernard Bee intend
it as a compliment as most suppose?
“There is Jackson with his Virginians standing like a stone wall.” Or
was he deprecating this great Southern hero?
While his troops were being decimated and flanked by a superior Yankee
army at First Bull Run, Bee made this comment to his adjutant as he observed
Jackson sitting astride his horse on Henry House Hill. “While we are being fired on and enfiladed,
there is Jackson and his Virginians standing like a stone wall.”
And of course, Robert E. Lee himself, the most revered
Confederate general, had been offered the command of the Union Army. Though he had great love for his country and
flag, he could not fight against his neighbors and his kin. He felt compelled to offer his service to
Virginia, his home state.
This is why people collect the War Between the States. Repercussions are felt to this day. States rights are still being argued. The residue of slavery still haunts our
society. The passions of our ancestors
still resonate. Ken Burns’ lengthy
documentary and the provocative film “Gettysburg” contribute to our collective
history.
Do not look for prices of Civil War collectibles to
diminish. Shows are more popular than
ever. Growing ranks of reenactors help
us relive the old battles. And perhaps it
is well we don’t forget.
My advice to those who collect this exciting category: know
the seller with whom you are dealing, whether it is autographs, weapons, flags,
uniforms, etc. There are many forgeries
and counterfeits in the marketplace. A
certificate of authenticity is nice, but know the person from whom it was
obtained. Be suspicious if the price is
too undervalued. It may not be the deal
you supposed after all. I truly believe
collecting the North and South during the period of 1860 – 1865 is an exciting
and a great investment for the future.
One is truly purchasing a unique piece of history.
Happy hunting!